In recent years, ramen business is booming in Singapore. 10 years ago, ramen did not have a reputation it has now and it has that trendy image so to speak -eating ramen. Now, I am always amazed how Singaporeans are so pro-Japanese food and with the recent launch of hot-shot star rated Japanese dining at MBS and Sentosa, the recognition (Japanese food) is getting even bigger (I am glad to witness that because I love Japanese food, quite naturally). Anyway, I do not eat ramen in Singapore because I am there to eat local food so I won't comment on how good Tonkotsu King is or Ippudo is. Actually, I don't frequently eat ramen in Tokyo either and I don't go hunting ramen trends here in Tokyo. I just eat at my comfortable nearby places. To a foreigner like me, Singapore is a noodle heaven with wide ranges of noodle dishes from coconuty laksa to irresistible bak chor mee, lor mee, char kway teow, hokkien mee, prawn mee, wanton mee.... the choices are simply mind boggling -and they are all amazing -textures and flavors. I am not comparing ramen and local noodles (let me simply call it mee here). But I think this "mee" is taken for granted, its got a lot of potential to be better but cannot. Why? Correct me if I am wrong, a bowl of ramen costs 12-SG$15. That means, they could spend more money on quality ingredients so, if the food cost is 30% (average on ramen), they spend $4-$5 on ingredients! The photo pic, claypot laksa at Depot Rd. Zhen Shan Mei for a small size is only 3 bucks. If they use a higher quality ingredients and sell it for say, $7, they will go out of business because people will start patronizing other stalls that sell laksa for a lesser price. My point is, a famous stall such as this laksa stall cannot raise prices in order to improve the flavor of their current laksa. The selling price is determined by the consumer not the stall owners. In the past 10 years, prices of ingredients and utility bills have inflated but the bowl of noodles remains the same or simply 50 cents or so higher. This means the profit margin is getting less and less for the stall owners. Low profit margin means bad business. On top of this low profit margin, comes long hours of hard work, day off once a week, namely, hard labor. Popular ramen joints do purchase, high quality ingredients and that is why the soup tastes good or toppings such as braised pork tastes good. Food is all about ingredients of course. Lame ingredients yield mediocre food, it's a fact. Singapore mee dishes have a lot of potential because people cooking it do not have such liberty to use better ingredients (although, with cheap ingredients, I think they do a great job selling it for 3 bucks...) given the current selling price. If they use better ingredients, their food would taste even better of course. I do not mean use lobster in prawn mee or those kind of gimmicky make-over. Just better ingredients like more shells or pork bones for example -an ingredients needed to beef up the flavors. If the Singaporean consumer do not have a mind shift in hawker prices, this is not going to happen (don't get me wrong though, I do also acknowledge that some people cannot afford to pay $5 for a bowl of mee, what I mean is, there should be more places with stalls with differing selling prices like ramen -you can find ramen in Tokyo for 300yen or you can find it 5 times that price, easily. The difference is quality ingredients.). Sadly, with high food cost and long working hours, working at a hawker stall is not a dream job for young Singaporean to-be-cooks or young entrepreneurs. Lack of successor is a grave problem and it definitely is starting to show.
Humble Japanese, trying to de-mystify Singapore cuisine and food culture. This is not a restaurant / stall rating blog.
11.24.2012
Noodle Potential: Mee & Ramen
In recent years, ramen business is booming in Singapore. 10 years ago, ramen did not have a reputation it has now and it has that trendy image so to speak -eating ramen. Now, I am always amazed how Singaporeans are so pro-Japanese food and with the recent launch of hot-shot star rated Japanese dining at MBS and Sentosa, the recognition (Japanese food) is getting even bigger (I am glad to witness that because I love Japanese food, quite naturally). Anyway, I do not eat ramen in Singapore because I am there to eat local food so I won't comment on how good Tonkotsu King is or Ippudo is. Actually, I don't frequently eat ramen in Tokyo either and I don't go hunting ramen trends here in Tokyo. I just eat at my comfortable nearby places. To a foreigner like me, Singapore is a noodle heaven with wide ranges of noodle dishes from coconuty laksa to irresistible bak chor mee, lor mee, char kway teow, hokkien mee, prawn mee, wanton mee.... the choices are simply mind boggling -and they are all amazing -textures and flavors. I am not comparing ramen and local noodles (let me simply call it mee here). But I think this "mee" is taken for granted, its got a lot of potential to be better but cannot. Why? Correct me if I am wrong, a bowl of ramen costs 12-SG$15. That means, they could spend more money on quality ingredients so, if the food cost is 30% (average on ramen), they spend $4-$5 on ingredients! The photo pic, claypot laksa at Depot Rd. Zhen Shan Mei for a small size is only 3 bucks. If they use a higher quality ingredients and sell it for say, $7, they will go out of business because people will start patronizing other stalls that sell laksa for a lesser price. My point is, a famous stall such as this laksa stall cannot raise prices in order to improve the flavor of their current laksa. The selling price is determined by the consumer not the stall owners. In the past 10 years, prices of ingredients and utility bills have inflated but the bowl of noodles remains the same or simply 50 cents or so higher. This means the profit margin is getting less and less for the stall owners. Low profit margin means bad business. On top of this low profit margin, comes long hours of hard work, day off once a week, namely, hard labor. Popular ramen joints do purchase, high quality ingredients and that is why the soup tastes good or toppings such as braised pork tastes good. Food is all about ingredients of course. Lame ingredients yield mediocre food, it's a fact. Singapore mee dishes have a lot of potential because people cooking it do not have such liberty to use better ingredients (although, with cheap ingredients, I think they do a great job selling it for 3 bucks...) given the current selling price. If they use better ingredients, their food would taste even better of course. I do not mean use lobster in prawn mee or those kind of gimmicky make-over. Just better ingredients like more shells or pork bones for example -an ingredients needed to beef up the flavors. If the Singaporean consumer do not have a mind shift in hawker prices, this is not going to happen (don't get me wrong though, I do also acknowledge that some people cannot afford to pay $5 for a bowl of mee, what I mean is, there should be more places with stalls with differing selling prices like ramen -you can find ramen in Tokyo for 300yen or you can find it 5 times that price, easily. The difference is quality ingredients.). Sadly, with high food cost and long working hours, working at a hawker stall is not a dream job for young Singaporean to-be-cooks or young entrepreneurs. Lack of successor is a grave problem and it definitely is starting to show.
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
4 件のコメント:
Hawker food traditionally and continues to be food for the masses. Which is why prices have to remain affordable. Attempts to use higher quality ingredients to justify higher prices usually fail, because people will generally opt for a lower price - and possibly - equally good one. I want to tell you that I enjoy reading your perspectives on Singapore food.
Exactly. That is my point. Due to the retiring masters and high cost of ingredients, hawker food is not going to get any better than what is being offered, generally speaking. It has a lot of potential but sadly not maximised in the name of affordability. Thanks LT for your feedback.
こんにちは、ご無沙汰してます。私がシンガポールで暮らし始めた1969年頃は新興国として必死に働く人達に支えられていた時代で、まだ食文化は「お腹を満たす」ことが優先されていました。だから味よりも安価であることがまず求められていたのでしょう。近所のカンポンの中には共同の食堂のような場所があり、食事時になると美味しそうなにおいが漂い、大人や子供が集い食事をしている風景を目にしました。共稼ぎが当たり前なので、自宅では炊事せずに三食を外食でというのも一般的でした。1970年代に入って余裕のある家庭が増えたのか、自宅で食べる風潮もありました。印象深かったのがブイヨンで有名なあのMaggiから「インスタントヌードル」の袋麺を発売して、そのテレビCMを流し始めたからです。当時、日本のインスタント麺はオーチャードのFujiyaくらいでしか買うことは出来ず、ローカルの人達からインスタント麺などそう簡単には受け入れられないだろう、と思いました。しかし今やスーパーやコンビニなどどこでも当たり前のように大量に販売されています。化学調味料とインスタント麺が日本から輸出されたのには戸惑いを感じますが、食の簡略化という方向性では一致するところだったのでしょう。食の平均単価に対する考え方。これは伝統食に対しては特にコンサバに働くのでしょうね。とは言え、蕎麦を日本人は立ち食いスタンドでは200円~300円くらいで食べるけれど、老舗の蕎麦屋さんでは1000円以上払う事もある。食を提供する場の雰囲気がもたす「空間」と「時間」に対して対価の重さを決める、プラス「味」の考え方がいかに重要かと実感します。シンガポールの伝統食を受け継ぐ若い人達が増えて活躍する事に期待する限りです。tetsushi
コメントを投稿